Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web


alsadekeen Home Page

Renal Articles

General Pediatrics

Photo Page

Favorite Links

Medical News

Custom Page

Common Problems Solving

Contact Me

Guest Book Page

Slide Show Page

Custom3 Page

SUBJECTS OF THE MONTH:
Congenital and Infantile Nephrotic Syndrome

INTRODUCTION أ¢â‚¬â€œ The term congenital nephrotic syndrome refers to disease which is present at birth or within the three first months of life. Later onset, between three months and one year of age, is called infantile nephrotic syndrome. Most of these children have a genetic basis for the renal disease and a poor outcome. The precise diagnosis of the glomerular lesion is based on clinical, laboratory and histological criteria. The congenital nephrotic syndrome of Finnish type (CNF) and diffuse mesangial sclerosis are the two main causes. There are, however, rare secondary and possibly curable disorders, such as congenital nephrotic syndrome induced by syphilis or toxoplasmosis .

 


CONGENITAL NEPHROTIC SYNDROME OF FINNISH TYPE أ¢â‚¬â€œ CNF is most frequent in Finland, with initial studies suggesting an incidence of 1.2 per 10,000 births [1,2]. With prenatal screening, the incidence has fallen to 0.9 per 10,000 births [3]. CNF has also been described in various ethnic groups throughout the world [4-6].

 

CNF is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait, with both sexes being involved equally. There are no manifestations of the disease in heterozygous individuals.


 

Pathology أ¢â‚¬â€œ Light microscopic studies of renal biopsy specimens obtained early in the course of the disease show mild mesangial hypercellularity and increased mesangial matrix in the glomeruli [4,7]. No immune deposits are detected by immunofluorescence studies. Over time, there is an increase in mesangial matrix accompanied by progressive glomerulosclerosis.

 

Tubulointerstitial changes are also prominent in CNF. Irregular microcystic dilatation of proximal tubules is the most striking feature; however, this change is not specific and is not seen in all patients [8]. Later in the course, interstitial fibrosis, lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration, tubular atrophy, and periglomerular fibrosis develop in parallel with sclerosis of the glomeruli.


 

Pathogenesis أ¢â‚¬â€œ It has been proposed that proteinuria in CNF results from an inherited error in the structure of the glomerular capillary filter. The abnormal gene was localized to the long arm of chromosome 19 in both Finnish and non-Finnish families [9-11].

 

The defective gene in CNF has been cloned and is named NPHS1 [12,13]. The gene encodes for a transmembrane protein, named nephrin, which is a member of the immunoglobulin family of cell adhesion molecules and is phosphorylated by Src family kinases [14]. Nephrin is specifically located at the slit diaphragm of the glomerular podocytes; this could explain the absence of slit diaphragms and foot processes in patients with CNF who have a mutant nephrin protein [15,16] and in mice with nephrin gene disruption [17].

 

In the original report, four different mutations in this gene were found to segregate with the disorder in affected Finnish families [12]; however, the two most common mutations, Fin-major and Fin-minor, account for nearly 90 percent of all affected Finnish patients [12,18]. In another study, 32 novel mutations in the nephrin gene were discovered in patients elsewhere in Europe and North America, but no abnormalities were found in seven affected individuals (including the 5' flanking region) [19]. These patients may have mutations elsewhere in the promoter, in intron areas, or in a gene encoding another protein that interacts with nephrin [20]. These results may indicate genetic heterogeneity in the disease.


 

Clinical features أ¢â‚¬â€œ Most infants with the CNF are born prematurely (35 to 38 weeks), with a low birth weight for gestational age. The placenta is enlarged, being more than 25 percent of the total birth weight. Fetal distress is common and the cranial sutures are widely separated due to delayed ossification. Infants often have a small nose and low ears. Flexion deformities of the hips, knees, and elbows are thought to be secondary to the large placenta.

 

Edema is present at birth or appears during the first week of life in one-half of cases. Severe nephrotic syndrome with marked ascites is always present by three months. The proteinuria is highly selective early in the course of the disease and hematuria is uncommon, reflecting the lack of inflammation in the glomeruli. The urinary protein losses are accompanied by profound hypoalbuminemia and severe hypogammaglobulinemia due in part to loss of selectivity as the disease progresses. As a result of these changes, nutritional status and statural growth are poor, and affected infants are highly susceptible to bacterial infections (peritonitis, respiratory infections) and to thromboembolic complications due to the severity of the nephrotic syndrome.  Hypothyroidism due to urinary losses of thyroxine-binding proteins is also common.

 

The blood urea nitrogen and creatinine concentrations are initially normal. Renal ultrasonography shows enlarged, hyperechogenic kidneys without normal corticomedullary differentiation.

 

End-stage renal failure invariably occurs between three and eight years of age. Prolonged survival is possible with aggressive supportive treatment, including dialysis and renal transplantation.


 

Treatment أ¢â‚¬â€œ The nephrotic syndrome in CNF is always resistant to corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs, since this is not an immunologic disease. Furthermore these drugs may be harmful due to the already high susceptibility to infection. A retrospective study of 21 infants with CNF, for example, found that 63 verified and 62 suspected septic episodes occurred over a mean follow-up period of one year [21].

 

Standard conservative treatment includes daily or every other day albumin infusion, gamma globulin replacement, nutrition with a high-protein, low-salt diet, vitamin and thyroxine substitution, and prevention of infections and thrombotic complications. The diet is provided by tube feeding or by parenteral alimentation.

 

However, the rate of intercurrent complications remains high and growth and development are usually retarded. As a result, some patients may require bilateral nephrectomy to prevent continued massive protein losses before the development of renal failure.

 

A possible medical alternative to nephrectomy has been described in three children. The combination of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and indomethacin therapy, both of which should lower intraglomerular pressure, led to a marked fall in protein excretion and striking improvement in nutritional status and growth [22,23].

 

If nephrectomy is performed, dialysis is provided until the patient reaches a weight of 8 to 9 kg. At this stage, renal transplantation can be considered [24,25]. Nephrotic syndrome can develop in the transplanted organ, occurring in 13 of 51 allografts (25 percent) placed into 45 children [26]. All nine affected patients had the Fin-major/Fin-major genotype, which is associated with the absence of nephrin in the native kidneys. Antibodies directed against glomeruli were observed in eight affected patients. Four also had elevated anti-nephrin antibody levels, suggesting a possible cause for recurrent nephrosis.


 

Antenatal diagnosis أ¢â‚¬â€œ The CNF becomes manifest during early fetal life, beginning at the gestation age of 15 to 16 weeks. The initial symptom is fetal proteinuria, which leads to a more than 10-fold increase in the amniotic fluid alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration. A parallel, but less important increase in the maternal plasma AFP level is observed. These changes are not specific, but they may permit the antenatal diagnosis of CNF in high risk families in which termination of the pregnancy might be considered [27].

 

However, false positive results do occur, often leading to abortion of healthy fetuses. In one study of 21 pregnancies that had been terminated because of increased AFP levels in amniotic fluid, only 12 fetuses were homozygous for nephrin gene mutations as determined by DNA sequencing [28]. The remaining nine were heterozygous carriers and would therefore not have developed CNF. The kidneys of both groups had a similar reduction in podocyte foot processes and slit pores.

 

Genetic linkage and haplotype analyses may diminish the risk of false positive results in informative families [29]. The four major haplotypes, which cover 90 percent of the CNF alleles in Finland, have been identified, resulting in a test with up to 95 percent accuracy. The recent identification of the gene responsible for the congenital nephrotic syndrome will soon permit antenatal diagnosis of the disease.



 

DIFFUSE MESANGIAL SCLEROSIS أ¢â‚¬â€œ Diffuse mesangial sclerosis is a second hereditary cause of infantile nephrotic syndrome associated with glomerular injury and rapid progression to end-stage renal failure. The same glomerular lesions are observed in the Drash syndrome which is characterized by the combination of nephropathy, male pseudohermaphroditism, and Wilms' tumor.

 

Diffuse mesangial sclerosis is seen exclusively in infancy [4,30-34] and appears to be transmitted in some families as an autosomal recessive trait [35]. The defective gene has not been identified.

 


Pathology أ¢â‚¬â€œ The glomerular lesions are characterized in the early stages by a fibrillar increase in mesangial matrix without mesangial cell proliferation [33-35]. The capillary walls are lined by hypertrophied podocytes. The fully developed lesion consists of the combination of thickening of the glomerular basement membranes and massive enlargement of mesangial areas, leading to reduction of the capillary lumens. The mesangial sclerosis eventually contracts the glomerular tuft into a sclerotic mass within a dilated urinary space. There is usually a corticomedullary gradient of involvement, with the deepest glomeruli being less affected. Tubules are severely damaged, especially in the deeper cortex where they are markedly dilated and often contain hyaline casts.

 

Electron microscopy reveals hypertrophic mesangial cells surrounded by an abundant mesangial matrix which often contains collagen fibrils. The podocytes are hypertrophied and contain many vacuoles. There is also irregular effacement of foot processes with focal detachment of the epithelial cell from the glomerular basement membrane.

 

Immunofluorescence shows mesangial deposits of IgM, C3, and C1q in the least affected glomeruli, while deposits of IgM and C3 outline the periphery of the sclerosed glomeruli. These immune deposits are probably nonspecific, occurring in areas of previous injury.

 

The same glomerular lesion is observed in the Drash syndrome (see below). As a result, all patients with diffuse mesangial sclerosis should be screened for the Drash syndrome. This consists of karyotyping in phenotypic females, looking for male pseudohermaphroditism with a 46 XY genotype, and ultrasonography should be performed in all patients, looking for Wilms' tumor and abnormal gonadal development. Some investigators also suggest that an assessment for mutations in the Wilms' tumor predisposing gene, WT1, should be performed to help identify individuals at risk for the tumor (see below) [36,37]. As an example, among 10 patients presenting with isolated diffuse mesangial sclerosis, four had mutations in the WT1 gene [37].


 

Pathogenesis أ¢â‚¬â€œ The pathogenesis of the isolated form of diffuse mesangial sclerosis is unknown. A primary defect involving the epithelial cell or one of the components of the glomerular extracellular matrix has been proposed.


 

Clinical and laboratory features أ¢â‚¬â€œ As opposed to the CNF, children with diffuse mesangial sclerosis appear normal at birth, with a normal birth weight and without placental enlargement. The nephrotic syndrome may be present at birth or even suspected in utero by the finding of an elevated plasma alpha-fetoprotein level in the mother or the discovery of large hyperechogenic kidneys [38]. More commonly, however, proteinuria with a bland urine sediment develops postnatally, increasing progressively during the first or the second year of life. Various types of extrarenal signs have been reported in isolated patients including nystagmus, cataract, mental retardation, microcephaly, severe myopia, muscular dystrophy.

 

All children progress to end-stage renal failure, frequently in association with hypertension. This usually occurs before age three, within a few months after the discovery of renal symptoms [34].


 

Treatment أ¢â‚¬â€œ Diffuse mesangial sclerosis is resistant to corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs. The degree of proteinuria it typically less severe than in the CNF and specific supplemental therapy is usually not required.

 

Treatment is supportive and consists of maintenance of electrolyte and water balance and adequate nutrition, prevention and treatment of infectious complications, and management of renal failure. Bilateral nephrectomy has been considered at the time of transplantation because of the theoretical risk of developing a Wilms' tumor. This issue remains unresolved, although Habib found no Wilms' tumor in the kidneys from 14 children with renal failure [34]. Recurrent disease does not develop in the transplant.

 

The combination of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and indomethacin therapy was used to treat one child with diffuse mesangial sclerosis [23]. The child had a sustained clinical response,  normal growth pattern, and suffered no adverse effects.



 

DIFFUSE MESANGIAL SCLEROSIS WITH DRASH SYNDROME أ¢â‚¬â€œ Denys and Drash first reported the triad of progressive renal disease, male pseudohermaphroditism, and Wilms' tumor [39,40]. All of the patients were infants with heavy proteinuria progressing rapidly to renal failure. Incomplete forms of the syndrome were described and the glomerulopathy was identified as diffuse mesangial sclerosis [41].


 

Epidemiology and genetics أ¢â‚¬â€œ More than 60 cases of Drash syndrome have currently been reported [39-43]. The Drash syndrome is usually sporadic, although occurrence in two kindreds has been reported. However, constitutional mutations occur in the Wilms' tumor predisposing gene, WT1 [44].

 

Wilms' tumor is an embryonic kidney tumor thought to arise from aberrant mesenchymal stem cell differentiation secondary to the loss of a tumor suppressor gene or genes [45,46]. The WT1 gene lies at chromosomal position 11p13; it appears to encode a zinc finger protein which is probably a transcription factor [47-50]. WT1 is also expressed in the gonads, suggesting that the genital abnormalities in the Drash syndrome may result from pleiotropic effects of mutations in the WT1 gene itself. This hypothesis was first confirmed in a report which identified constitutional heterozygous mutations within the WT1 gene in some individuals with the Drash syndrome [51].

 

Subsequently, mutations of WT1 have been found in most patients with this syndrome. Most abnormalities are missense changes either in exon 9, which encodes for zinc finger 3 (with a mutational hot spot at an arginine residue thought to interact with the consensus DNA sequence), or in exon 8 which encodes for zinc finger 2 [52].


 

Clinical presentation أ¢â‚¬â€œ Diffuse mesangial sclerosis is a constant feature of the Drash syndrome. It is associated with the two other components of the triad in the complete form, but with only one of the two in the incomplete forms.

 

The clinical course of the nephropathy is not different from that described above in isolated diffuse mesangial sclerosis. However, Wilms' tumor may be the first clinical manifestation of the syndrome. Thus, careful renal ultrasonography should be performed, looking for nephroblastoma, in any patient found to have diffuse mesangial sclerosis. The tumor may be unilateral or bilateral and is associated in a few cases with nodules of nephroblastomatosis [35,44].

 

Male pseudohermaphroditism, characterized by ambiguous genitalia or female phenotype with dysgenetic testis or streak gonads, is observed in all 46 XY patients. In contrast, all 46 XX children appear to have a normal female phenotype, with normal ovaries, when the information was available. The finding of a normal male phenotype seems to exclude the diagnosis of Drash syndrome.



 

IDIOPATHIC NEPHROTIC SYNDROME أ¢â‚¬â€œ Idiopathic nephrosis rarely occurs at birth, more commonly presenting during the first year of life. All the morphological variants of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome seen in older children can occur at this time including minimal change disease, diffuse mesangial proliferation, and focal and segmental glomerular sclerosis.

 

Establishing the diagnosis of one of these disorders may be important clinically, since steroid-responsiveness with a favorable course can be seen [6,53]. However, most affected infants are resistant to therapy and many progress to end-stage renal disease.

 

Such cases are often familial and an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance has been observed. A causative gene for one of the autosomal recessive forms of this disorder has been identified using a positional cloning technique directed at the chromosomal area 1q25-31 [54]. It encodes an integral membrane protein, podocin, which is found exclusively in glomerular podocytes.  

A locus on chromosome 2p appears to be responsible for some forms of steroid-sensitive idiopathic nephrosis, which is inherited in an autosomal recessive fashion [55]. Some affected families, however, do not display linkage to this locus, suggesting additional genetic heterogeneity.



 

OTHER أ¢â‚¬â€œ A number of other disorders are infrequent causes of infantile nephrotic syndrome:

 

  أ¢â‚¬آ¢  Congenital syphilis can cause membranous nephropathy [56,57]. Histological examination often shows a mixed pattern with membranous nephropathy and mesangial proliferation. Penicillin treatment leads to the resolution of the syphilis and the renal abnormalities.

 

  أ¢â‚¬آ¢  The nephrotic syndrome may be induced by congenital toxoplasmosis [58]. Proteinuria may be present at birth or may develop during the first three months, in association with ocular or neurological symptoms. Histological examination often shows mesangial proliferation with or without focal glomerulosclerosis. Treatment of toxoplasmosis or steroid therapy usually leads to remission of the proteinuria.

 

  أ¢â‚¬آ¢  Congenital or infantile nephrotic syndrome has been reported in association with cytomegalovirus, rubeola virus, human immunodeficiency virus, and mercury intoxication.

 

  أ¢â‚¬آ¢  The Galloway syndrome is characterized by microcephaly, mental retardation, hiatus hernia, and the nephrotic syndrome [59]. It appears to be transmitted as an autosomal recessive trait. The nephrotic syndrome is usually severe, resistant to steroid therapy and present from the first days of life. Renal biopsy reveals focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis. The underlying defect is not known.




 

References

1.  Hallman, N, Hjelt, L. Congenital nephrotic syndrome. J Pediatr 1959; 55:152.

2.  Hallman, N, Norio, R, Rapola, J. Congenital nephrotic syndrome. Nephron 1973; 11:101.

3.  Levy, M, Feingold, J. Estimating prevalence in single-gene kidney diseases progressing to renal failure. Kidney Int 2000; 58:925.

4.  Habib, R, Bois E. Heterogeneity of early onset nephrotic syndromes in infants (nephrotic syndrome "in infants"). Anatomical, clinical and genetic study of 37 cases. Helv Paediatr Acta 1973; 28:91.

5.  Kaplan, BS, Bureau, MA, Drummond, KN. The nephrotic syndrome in the first year of life: Is a pathologic classification possible? J Pediatr 1974; 85:615.

6.  Sibley, RK, Mahan, J, Mauer, SM, Vernier, RL. A clinicopathologic study of forty eight infants with nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int 1985; 27:544.

7.  Huttunen, RP, Rapola, J, Vilska, J, Hallman, N. Renal pathology of congenital nephrotic syndrome of Finnish type. A quantitative light microscopic study on 50 patients. Int J Pediatr Nephrol 1980; 1:10.

8.  Rapola, J, Sariola, H, Ekblom, P. Pathology of fetal congenital nephrosis: Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural studies. Kidney Int 1984; 25:701.

9.  Kestila, M, et al. Congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type maps to the long arm of chromosome 19. Am J Hum Genet 1994; 54:757.

10. Lenkkeri, U, Mannikko, M, McCready, P, et al. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 64:51.

11. Savage, JM, Jefferson, JA, Maxwell, AP, et al. Improved prognosis for congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type in Irish families. Arch Dis Child 1999; 80:466.

12. Kestilط¸آ¹, M, Lenkkeri, U, Mط¸آ¹nnikkط¸ع¯, M, et al. Positionally cloned gene for a novel glomerular protein أ¢â‚¬â€œ nephrin أ¢â‚¬â€œ is mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome. Mol Cell 1998; 1:575.

13. Pollak, MR. Inherited podocytopathies: FSGS and nephrotic syndrome from a genetic viewpoint. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13:3016.

14. Lahdenpera, J, Kilpelainen, P, Liu, XL, Pikkarainen, T. Clustering-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of nephrin by Src family kinases. Kidney Int 2003; 64:404.

15. Ruotsalainen, V, Ljungberg, P, Wartiovaara, J, et al. Nephrin is specifically located at the slit diaphragm of glomerular podocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:7962.

16. Tryggvason, K. Unraveling the mechanisms of glomerular ultrafiltration: Nephrin, a key component of the slit diaphragm. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10:2440.

17. Rantanen, M, Palmen, T, Patari, A, et al. Nephrin TRAP Mice Lack Slit Diaphragms and Show Fibrotic Glomeruli and Cystic Tubular Lesions. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13:1586.

18. Patrakka, J, Kestila, M, Wartiovaara, J, et al. Congenital nephrotic syndrome (NPHS1): features resulting from different mutations in Finnish patients. Kidney Int 2000; 58:972.

19. Lenkkeri, U, Mannikko, M, McCready, P, et al. Structure of the gene for congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type (NPHS1) and characterization of mutations. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 64:51.

20. Shih, NY, Li, J, Karpitskii, V, et al. Congenital nephrotic syndrome in mice lacking CD2-associated protein. Science 1999; 286:312.

21. Ljungberg, P, Holmberg, C, Jalanko, H. Infection in infants with congenital nephrosis of the Finnish type. Pediatr Nephrol 1997; 11:148.

22. Pomeranz, A, Wolach, B, Bernheim, J, et al. Successful treatment of Finnish congenital nephrotic syndrome with captopril and indomethacin. J Pediatr 1995; 126:140.

23. Heaton, PA, Smales, O, Wong, W. Congenital nephrotic syndrome responsive to captopril and indometacin. Arch Dis Child 1999; 81:174.

24. Mahan, JD, Mauer, SM, Sibley, RK, Vernier, RC. Congenital nephrotic syndrome: The evolution of medical management and results of renal transplantation. J Pediatr 1984; 105:548.

25. Holmberg, C, Jalanko, H, Koskimies, O, et al. Renal transplantation in small children with congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type. Transplant Proc 1991; 23:1378.

26. Patrakka, J, Ruotsalainen, V, Reponen, P, et al. Recurrence of nephrotic syndrome in kidney grafts of patients with congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type: role of nephrin. Transplantation 2002; 73:394.

27. Ryynط¸آ¹nen, M, Seppط¸آ¹lط¸آ¹, M, Kuusela, P, et al. Antenatal screening for congenital nephrosis in Finland by maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90:437.

28. Patrakka, J, Martin, P, Salonen, R, et al. Proteinuria and prenatal diagnosis of congenital nephrosis in fetal carriers of nephrin gene mutations. Lancet 2002; 359:1575.

29. Mannikko, M, Kestila, M, Lenkkeri, U, et al. Improved prenatal diagnosis of the congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type based on DNA analysis. Kidney Int 1997; 51:868.

30. Beale, MC, Staver, DS, Kissane, JM, Robson, AM. Congenital glomerulosclerosis and nephrotic syndrome in 2 infants. Am J Dis Child 1979; 133:842.

31. Rumpelt, HJ, Bachmann, HJ. Infantile nephrotic syndrome with diffuse mesangial sclerosis: A disturbance of glomerular basement membrane development? Clin Nephrol 1980; 13:146.

32. Kikuta, Y, Yoshimura, Y, Saito, T, et al. Nephrotic syndrome with diffuse mesangial sclerosis in identical twins. J Pediatr 1983; 102:586.

33. Urbach, J, Drukker, A, Rosenmann, E. Diffuse mesangial sclerosis: Light, immunofluorescent and electron microscopy findings. Int J Pediatr Nephrol 1985; 6:101.

34. Habib, R. Nephrotic syndrome in the first year of life. Pediatr Nephrol 1993; 7:347.

35. Habib, R, Gubler, MC, Antignac, C, Gagnadoux, MF. Diffuse mesangial sclerosis: A congenital glomerulopathy with nephrotic syndrome. In: Advances in Nephrology, Grunfeld, JP (Ed), Year Book, Chicago, 1993, p. 43.

36. Schumacher, V, Scharer, K, Wuhl, E, et al. Spectrum of early onset nephrotic syndrome associated with WT1 missense mutations. Kidney Int 1998; 53:1594.

37. Jeanpierre, C, Denamur, E, Henry, I, et al. Identification of constitutional WT1 mutations, in patients with isolated diffuse mesangial sclerosis, and analysis of genotype/phenotype correlations by use of a computerized mutation database. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 62:824.

38. Spear, GS, Steinhaus, KA, Quddusi, A. Diffuse mesangial sclerosis in a fetus. Clin Nephrol 1991; 36:46.

39. Denys, P, Malvaux, P, Van den Berghe, H, et al. Association d'un syndrome anatomopathologique de pseudo-hermaphrodisme masculin, d'une tumeur de Wilms, d'une nط£آ©phropathie parenchymateuse et d'un mosaicisme XX/XY. Arch Fr Pediatr 1967; 24:729.

40. Drash, A, Sherman, F, Hartmann, W, Blizzard, RM. A syndrome of pseudohermaphroditism, Wilms' tumor, hypertension and degenerative renal disease. J Pediatr 1970; 76:585.

41. Habib, R, Loirat, C, Gubler, MC, et al. The nephropathy associated with male pseudohermaphroditism and Wilms' tumor (Drash syndrome: A distinctive glomerular lesion, report of 10 cases. Clin Nephrol 1985; 24:269.

42. Gallo, GB, Chemes, HE. The association of Wilm's tumor, male pseudohermaphroditism and diffuse glomerular disease (Drash syndrome): Report of 8 cases with clinical and morphologic findings and review of the literature. Pediatr Pathol 1987; 7:175.

43. Jadresic, L, Leake, J, Gordon, I, Dillon, MJ, Grant, DB, Pritchard, J. Clinicopathologic review of twelve children with nephropathy, Wilms' tumor and genital abnormalities (Drash syndrome). J Pediatr 1990; 117:717.

44. Coppes, MJ, Campbell, CE, Williams, BR. The role of WT1 in Wilms tumorigenesis. FASEB J 1993; 7:886.

45. Weinberg, RA. Tumor suppressor genes. Science 1991; 254:1138.

46. Huff, V. Wilms tumor genetics. Am J Med Genet 1998; 79:260.

47. Call, KM, Glaser, T, Ito, CY, et al. Isolation and characterization of a zinc finger polypeptide gene at the human chromosome 11 Wilms' tumor locus. Cell 1990; 60:509.

48. Gessler, M, Pouska, A, Cavenee, W, et al. Homozygous deletion in Wilms' tumours of a zinc-finger gene identified by chromosome jumping. Nature 1990; 343:774.

49. Haber, DA, Buckler, AJ, Glaser, T, et al. An internal deletion within an 11p13 zinc finger gene contributes to the development of Wilms' tumor. Cell 1990; 61:1257.

50. Lee, SB, Huang, K, Palmer, R, et al. The Wilms tumor suppressor WT1 encodes a transcriptional activator of amphiregulin. Cell 1999; 98:663.

51. Pelletier, J, Bruening, W, Li, FP, et al. WT1 mutations contribute to abnormal genital system development and hereditary Wilms' tumor. Nature 1991; 353:431.

52. Little, M, Wells, C. A clinical overview of WT1 mutations. Hum Mutat 1997; 9:209.

53. Fuchshuber, A, Gribouval, O, Ronner, V, et al. Clinical and genetic evaluation of familial steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome in childhood. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:374.

54. Boute, N, Gribouval, O, Roselli, S, et al. NPHS2, encoding the glomerular protein podocin, is mutated in autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome [In Process Citation]. Nat Genet 2000; 24:349.

55. Ruf, RG, Fuchshuber, A, Karle, SM, Lemainque, A. Identification of the first gene locus (SSNS1) for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome on chromosome 2p. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:1897.

56. Kaplan, BS, Wiglesworth, FW, Marks, MI, Drummond, KN. The glomerulopathy of congenital syphilis أ¢â‚¬â€œ an immune deposit disease. J Pediatr 1972; 81:1154.

57. Losito, A, Bucciarelli, E, Massi-Benedetti, F, Lato, M. Membranous glomerulonephritis in congenital syphilis. Clin Nephrol 1979; 12:32.

58. Shahin, B, Papadopoulou, ZL, Jenis, EH. Congenital nephrotic syndrome associated with congenital toxoplasmosis. J Pediatr 1974; 85:366.

59. Galloway, WH, Mowat, AP. Congenital microcephaly with hiatus hernia and nephrotic syndrome in two sibs. J Med Genet 1968; 5:319.

FEVER IN CHILDREN


Fever in Children


Victor Nizet, MD, Robert J. Vinci, MD, and
Frederick H. Lovejoy, Jr, MD*

FOCUS QUESTIONS


1. What is the mechanism of action of the antipyretic drugs most useful for treating children?
2. What nonpharmacologic measures are helpful in the treatment of fever in children?
3. What is the epidemiology of occult bacteremia?
4. What is the differential diagnosis of fever of unknown origin in infants, children, and adolescents?



Fever is the most common presenting complaints in pediatric practice, accounting for 10% to 20% of office and emergency room visits.

Pathophysiology of Fever

Three pathophysiologic bases exist for fever. The first involves the raising of the hypothalamic set point in the central nervous system. Infection, collagen vascular disease, and malignancies are most commonly responsible. This type of fever is lowered by antipyretics and physical removal of heat. A second type of fever is a result of heat production exceeding heat loss as, for example, in salicylate overdose, hyperthryroidism, excessive environmental temperature, and malignant hyperthermia. The third type of fever is caused by defective heat loss, as seen with ectodermal dysplasia, heat stroke, and poisoning via anticholinergic drugs. Antipyretics are ineffective for the second and third types of fever.


Biologic Process of Fever Reduction

Fever occurs as a result of a number of complex biologic interactions. Exogenous pyrogens, including viruses, bacteria, fungi, antigen-antibody complexes, and drugs, are engulfed by phagocytic leukocytes, leading to the production of an endogenous pyrogen called interleukin-1 (Fig. 1). This compound (also known as lymphocyte-activating factor), in conjunction with interleukin-2, is responsible for increasing the number of helper T cells and initiating the production of prostaglandins in the hypothalamus. Helper T cells are instrumental in fighting infections; prostaglandins are responsible for producing fever.

Phagocytic leukocytes, when activated by leukotrienes, prostaglandins, and calcium, phagocytose the exogenous pyrogen and synthesize the endogenous pyrogen interleukin-1 (Fig. 2). Monocytes and macrophages are particularly productive of interleukin-1, leukocytes and eosinophils less so, and lymphocytes not at all.
Interleukin-1 acts on the arachidonic acid pathway, stimulating the production of prostaglandins in the vascular endothelial cells of the hypothalamus. Prostaglandins form as a result of the catabolism of phospholipids in endothelial cells of the central nervous system to arachidonic acid, then by the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase through endoperoxides, and ultimately to prostacyclins, prostaglandins, and thromboxanes (Fig. 3).


Treatment

The febrile child may be treated with antipyretic drugs or by nonpharmacologic adjunctive measures. The use of antibiotics in the management of patients who have suspected infectious etiologies is discussed separately in the sections on acute fever and fever of unknown origin.

ANTIPYRETICS

How do prostaglandins and antipyretics affect body mechanisms so as to raise and lower body temperature? Current evidence suggests that microinjections of prostaglandins increase the firing rate of cold-sensitive cells in the preoptic anterior nuclei and decrease the activity of warm-sensitive cells, resulting in shifting of the set point to a higher temperature setting. The body responds to a colder peripheral skin temperature by vasoconstriction, which decreases heat loss, and through increased shivering, which increases heat generation. Antipyretics lower the central set point, resulting in the periphery feeling hot at the skin surface. The body lowers its temperature by vasodilation, which increases heat loss, and lying quietly, which minimizes heat generation.

Arguments exist both for and against lowering fever. Arguments for include: 1) decreasing the discomfort associated with fever and, often, settling an apprehensive home environment; 2) keeping extreme temperature elevations (>41ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ°C to 41.6ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ°C [106ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ°F to 107ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ°F]) from causing permanent damage to the central nervous system; and 3) decreasing, in theory, the likelihood of a febrile seizure in those who have such seizures, although no study has demonstrated that treatment of fever decreases the incidence of febrile seizures. Arguments against lowering fever include: 1) situations where adverse effects associated with the use of antipyretics outweigh the benefits of fever reduction; 2) situations where reducing fever may obscure diagnostic or prognostic signs; 3) the generally recognized view that most fever is short-lived and benign; and 4) an increasing body of information suggesting that fever may protect the host.

It now is clear that aspirin, acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs exert their antipyretic effect through inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase enzyme, thereby preventing synthesis of prostaglandins from arachidonic acid (Fig. 3). Because they do not suppress interleukin-1, they do not diminish proliferation of helper T cells and, thus, do not adversely affect the body's ability to fight infection. Corticosteroids in vitro and in vivo, on the other hand, decrease interleukin-1 release from monocytes and macrophages quantitatively. This activity is, in fact, detrimental to the body's ability to fight infection.

Aspirin, acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents all have excellent antipyretic and analgesic activity. Only aspirin and nonsteroidal agents have anti-inflammatory activity.

NONPHARMACOLOGIC ADJUNCTIVE MEASURES

In addition to the pharmacologic means of lowering elevated body temperature, adjunctive approaches may be taken. Since the rate of fluid loss may be increased as a result of an elevated temperature, it is important for the febrile child to receive adequate hydration. In addition, maintenance of adequate intravascular volume allows for better heat dissipation. The child, however, should not be overhydrated, which can occur when large volumes of water or nonelectrolyte-containing solutions are administered, because this runs the risk of hyponatremia. Sponging with tepid water has been shown to be effective in lowering fever. When this measure is used by itself, however, body temperature quickly returns to its previous level as a result of shivering, which attempts to bring the body temperature back up to the untreated elevated set point. For these reasons, sponging is considered useful only as an adjunct to antipyretic therapy; the combination of tepid water sponging and an antipyretic may result in more rapid and effective temperature lowering than antipyretic therapy alone, often decreasing patient discomfort and allaying parental concern. Parents should be advised to use tepid water because cold water will increase discomfort. Finally, although alcohol baths or sponging have been recommended in the past, this measure has fallen out of favor because the alcohol can be absorbed through inhalation and through the skin surface, potentially leading to alcohol-induced hypoglycemia and even coma.

Fever may occur as an acute event or as a prolonged symptom in the pediatric patient. The following two sections will review the approach to the child whose fever is acute as well as the child whose fever is of unknown origin (FUO).

Acute Fever and Bacteremia

The most vexing clinical question to be answered in any febrile child is: Is this fever a marker for occult bacteremia? As opposed to the term "sepsis,'' which should be used only to describe the ill-appearing febrile child, occult bacteremia refers to the relatively well-appearing child whose blood culture is positive for a pathogenic organism. The primary clinical concern in children who have occult bacteremia is the small but important percentage of those who develop secondary complications from invasive bacterial disease--most notably, meningitis, septic arthritis, and bacterial sepsis. Therefore, the approach to the febrile child requires management strategies that can identify the child at risk for bacteremia and use of treatment options that diminish the risk of secondary complications.


EPIDEMIOLOGY

Numerous epidemiologic studies have delineated the causative organisms of occult bacteremia. Early reports of pneumococcal bacteremia in pediatric patients in the ambulatory setting appeared in the medical literature in the early 1970s. Subsequently, Klein and colleagues reported their finding that occult bacteremia occurred in 3.2% of 600 consecutive febrile children from the "walk-in'' clinic at Boston City Hospital. A more recent multicenter study involving 6794 febrile children (temperature >39.0ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ°C and ages 3 to 36 months) found a 2.9% incidence of occult bacteremia in children who were managed in the ambulatory setting (Table 1). Most studies have confirmed a 3% to 5% incidence of bacteremia in this age group. Occult bacteremia occurs most commonly in the child 3 to 36 months of age because of both immunologic and epidemiologic factors. These include the normal decline of protective maternal antibodies, bacterial colonization of the nasopharynx, increased contact with other ill children, and the virulence and invasive nature of the organisms usually responsible for bacteremia.

Although Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common organism that produces occult bacteremia, other bacterial pathogens remain important, including Haemophilus influenzae type b, Neisseria meningitidis, Salmonella sp, group A Streptococcus, and on rare occasions, enteric pathogens. Although the incidence of bacteremia has remained essentially constant, the relative importance of various organisms has changed considerably. Previously, H influenzae type b was reported as the responsible organism in 25% of bacteremic children. Two recent studies have described an incidence of H influenzae bacteremia of 2 of 27 (7.4%) and 9 of 192 (4.7%).

Because infections due to H influenzae often are more severe than those due to other organisms, children who have H influenzae disease often require hospitalization at the initial visit. Other reasons for the decline of H influenzae disease include the effectiveness of the H influenzae conjugate vaccine and a decline in the presence of the organism in the community. The decline in H influenzae disease may be more significant epidemiologically because the rate of complications was higher with H influenzae type b than with other bacteria.


EVALUATION

The differential diagnosis of the acutely febrile child includes benign conditions such as viral upper respiratory tract infections and serious infections such as bacteremia and meningitis (Table 2). Distinguishing between these entities requires the expertise of an experienced clinician who is well-versed in the subtle presentations of the diseases that underlie the fever.
The history of any febrile child should focus on the duration and height of the fever as well as on associated symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhea, respiratory symptoms, and a history of rash (especially petechiae). Additionally, assessment of neurologic functioning should include behavioral changes such as irritability and lethargy as well as parental estimate of the degree of illness and the child's level of interaction. A careful review of any known exposures should include family illnesses and ill contacts with other children, especially in settings such as child care centers. The child's immunization status and travel history may provide valuable information. A history of previous serious infections, such as bacteremia and meningitis; recurrent bacterial infections; loss of splenic function; or the presence of immunologic disorders, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, sickle cell disease, and hypogammaglobulinemia and other immunodeficiency disorders, indicates an increased risk for bacterial disease. Finally, the use of antibiotics and antipyretics may have implications for the evaluation of febrile children; the former may alter the utility of diagnostic cultures and the latter may affect the clinical evaluation of the patient. Recent studies have suggested that clinicians are more likely to differentiate children who have serious bacterial infections prior to the defervescence produced by the use of antipyretics.


PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

The first step in the physical examination of a febrile child should be a careful consideration of his or her general appearance. In the hands of an experienced clinician, this assessment remains the most important aspect of the physical examination. Observation scales such as the Acute Illness Observational Scale may help to focus assessment of the ill child and predict the risk of significant illness. Using this scale, McCarthy and colleagues found that children who had scores greater than 10 were more likely to have serious bacterial infections compared with children whose scores were less than 10. While there is no evidence of an improved outcome in children who are evaluated via such observation scales, they remain helpful as a mechanism to focus the examiner on the behavioral and interactive state of the child. Careful observation and analysis of vital signs, state of hydration, and peripheral perfusion are required to assess the acuity of the illness as well as the need for hospitalization. The height of the fever, especially in children who have temperatures >40ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ°C, appears to be a marker for an increased risk of occult bacteremia.

A careful examination may localize a bacterial focus of infection such as otitis media. Tachypnea out of proportion to the degree of fever, even in the absence of focal pulmonary findings, suggests pneumonia. Sinusitis is supported by a history of chronic nasal discharge, especially if mucopurulent. The presence of suprapubic or costal vertebral angle tenderness suggests an acute urinary tract infection. A detailed musculoskeletal examination, including a careful examination of the child's gait, may help uncover the sometimes elusive diagnoses of septic arthritis or osteomyelitis.

Finally, a detailed neurologic examination, including mental status changes, is required to diagnose the child who may have a central nervous system (CNS) infection.
Despite a careful assessment, the clinician frequently is faced with the dilemma of the febrile child who has no discernible focus of infection. In such a case, it may prove helpful to augment the clinical examination with laboratory data.

LABORATORY EVALUATION

The laboratory evaluation can be used to identify the child who is at increased risk for bacteremia as well as to diagnose infections that may not be apparent on clinical examination. Most studies seeking to identify the "child at risk'' have focused on the utility of the peripheral white blood cell count. Because of an association of peripheral white blood cell counts >15 000/mmط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ³ with the presence of occult bacteremia, decision analysis studies have attempted to refine the approach to the febrile child. A recent study by Jaffe et al, for example, suggested that a white blood cell count >15 000/mmط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ³ is an insensitive marker for occult bacteremia and suggested instead that a value of >10 000/mmط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ³ be used when making decisions regarding presumptive antimicrobial therapy. Other markers of acute inflammation, including the absolute band count, increased sedimentation rate, and elevated C-reactive protein, also have not helped identify the bacteremic patient. Currently, no single laboratory test can predict the likelihood of bacteremia in febrile children with certainty.

An important consideration in the employment of laboratory studies is the search for other "clinically silent'' infections, especially pneumonia and urinary tract infections. The child who has significant respiratory symptoms or any focal pulmonary abnormality on examination warrants a chest radiograph. Because of the inability of the child to localize complaints specific to the urinary tract and the nonspecific nature of the symptoms of urinary tract infections, a careful examination of freshly obtained urine is necessary in the evaluation of the febrile child. Urinary tract infections occur in 1% to 4% of febrile children and are suggested by the presence of a positive reaction of assays for leukocyte esterase or urinary nitrites or the presence of pyuria, bacteriuria, or both on wet mount examination of the urine. Although more time-consuming, a urine Gram stain demonstrating bacteria under oil immersion microscopy has been shown to correlate with positive urine culture results.

Examination of the stool for the presence of white blood cells may offer evidence of invasive bacterial gastroenteritis. A lumbar puncture certainly is not required in all febrile children, but should be reserved for those in whom there is any clinical suspicion of CNS involvement. This becomes critically important in children less than 12 months of age, as even an experienced clinician may have difficulty localizing the signs of CNS infections in this age group.

TREATMENT


The presence of a focal bacterial infection on examination warrants antimicrobial treatment aimed at the most common bacterial etiologies. However, controversy continues to surround the question of the utility of antimicrobial therapy in the febrile child who has no source of infection. Early studies suggesting an improved outcome for bacteremic patients who received oral antimicrobial therapy at their initial visit prior to obtaining the results of blood cultures have not been corroborated by more recent randomized clinical trials. The results of a recent multicenter trial suggest that treatment with intramuscular ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg) is more likely to decrease the incidence of focal bacterial infections and to eradicate bacterial pathogens from the blood of bacteremic children compared with children receiving oral amoxicillin.

Other factors that need to be considered when contemplating antibiotic therapy include the overall assessment of the child, the status of the child's immunologic functioning, the ability of the parents or caretakers to observe for the subtle manifestations of bacterial sepsis, and the ease of obtaining follow-up within the first 24 hours after initial presentation. Clinicians will need to individualize their approach to the febrile child: No single parameter can be used to determine the most appropriate therapy.


COMPLICATIONS

Complications from occult bacteremia have been reported to occur in 4% to 20% of patients. These usually are due to the development of a secondary focus, in particular, meningitis, pneumonia, septic arthritis, pneumonia, or persistent bacteremia. The incidence of complications currently is organism-specific and has been reported to occur in 2% to 4% of children who have S pneumoniae bacteremia, 7% of children who have H influenzae bacteremia, and 25% of those who have N meningitidis bacteremia.


THE CHILD WHO HAS BACTEREMIA

Because 3% of children will have positive blood cultures for a true bacterial pathogen, clinicians will be faced with other management decisions once the results of blood cultures are known. All children who have a positive blood culture require a repeat clinical examination to determine the presence of any focal complication. This is especially true if infection with the organism is associated with a high rate of complications, such as in H influenzae type b and N meningitidis, or if the organism is an unusual pathogen, such as Escherichia coli or any of the pathogens associated with urinary tract disease. If the follow-up clinical assessment finds the child to be afebrile and clinically improved, outpatient antimicrobial therapy should be initiated for 5 to 7 days. Sensitivity patterns of the organism can be used to guide the selection of antibiotics, although amoxicillin (40 mg/kg per day) or penicillin VR (25 000 to 50 000 U/kg per day) generally is sufficient for the treatment of pneumococcal infections, and third-generation cephalosporins or combination therapy with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid will maximize the coverage for beta-lactamase-producing organisms such as H influenzae type b. If on repeat examination the child is febrile or exhibits other manifestations of focal bacterial infection, he or she requires a complete evaluation, including lumbar puncture and hospitalization for intravenous antibiotic therapy and assessment for any focal complications (Table 3).



PROGNOSIS

The prognosis for most children who have bacteremia remains excellent. For many, occult bacteremia will be a transient phenomenon requiring outpatient antibiotic treatment. However, clinicians should be aware of the risks of focal infections, especially life-threatening events such as meningitis and bacterial sepsis, even in the well-appearing febrile child. Although studies designed to decrease the risk of bacterial complications do not, as of yet, support routine antimicrobial treatment of the febrile child, other factors, including the clinical assessment of an experienced physician, the ability and ease of obtaining follow-up, and the observational abilities of the parent or caretaker, remain important considerations in management.


Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO)

Although precise definitions vary, when a child has a significant fever (>38.5ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ·ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ·ط·آ¢ط¢آ¢ط·آ·ط¢آ¢ط·آ¢ط¢آ°C) lasting more than 2 weeks and the diagnosis remains uncertain despite a careful history and physical examination, it is appropriate to consider the patient to have fever of unknown origin (FUO). Because fever is a primary manifestation of many diseases (Table 4), including benign, self-limited infections, chronic multisystem inflammatory processes, and life-threatening malignancies, the pediatrician is faced with an important and challenging diagnostic dilemma. An organized framework for the evaluation of children who have FUO is essential: 1) to facilitate early diagnosis, 2) to ensure that thorough attention is given to excluding serious disease, and 3) to avoid a "fishing expedition'' involving expensive or invasive tests of low diagnostic yield.


EPIDEMIOLOGY

Although published series of FUO in children differ substantially in their inclusion criteria, certain important considerations emerge. First, infections are the most common identified source of FUO in children (approximately 50% of cases), followed in order by collagen-inflammatory disorders (more common in females and children greater than 6 years of age) and neoplastic diseases. Second, the vast majority of patients have a disease process seen commonly in general pediatrics. Thus, rather than an exhaustive search for rare or exotic diagnoses, attention should be focused on recognizing subtle or atypical presentations of common disorders. Finally, although roughly 20% of cases (presumed viral infections) will resolve spontaneously, a larger percentage will have infections requiring specific therapy. Up to 40% of patients will have a serious disorder or lasting sequelae; mortality rates of 6% to 17% have been reported in studies of pediatric FUO. Therefore, prolonged fever in childhood cannot be approached casually.

Perhaps the most important lesson to be learned from the pediatric FUO literature is that there is no substitute for a complete and detailed history and careful, repeated physical examination. The final diagnosis in the majority of patients was indicated or suggested by history or physical findings rather than by specific laboratory investigations or imaging studies.

EVALUATION

When a child presents having FUO, the history should include a meticulous review of any relevant symptoms. Significant weight loss or linear growth impairment suggests long-standing chronic conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease. The first appearance of symptoms such as fatigue, malaise, and diminished appetite (which commonly accompany acute fever in children) should be documented because these may predate the onset of fever. Other symptoms, such as abdominal pain, cough, headache, or dysuria, may be a clue to localized infection. Joint pain and rashes are characteristic of collagen-inflammatory diseases and of infections such as hepatitis B virus and Lyme disease. A medical history of recurrent fevers or infections may indicate an immune defect such as cyclic neutropenia or IgG subclass deficiency. Recent surgical procedures could provide a nidus for occult infection, while transfusion of blood products carries a small risk of hepatitis virus or HIV transmission. Drug fevers may occur as a reaction to a medication the child has been prescribed. Family history should be screened for autoimmune disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and tuberculosis.

Any contact with infected or otherwise ill individuals should be investigated thoroughly. Child care centers can be a source of exposure to communicable diseases, such as Ebstein-Barr Virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), hepatitis, or salmonellosis. Animal exposure may result in transmission of leptospirosis (dogs), toxoplasmosis (cats), rat-bite fever (rats), psittacosis (birds), or salmonellosis (turtles). A detailed history could raise the possibility of endemic disease such as malaria, hepatitis, enteric fever, tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, or coccidiomycosis. One should inquire about visits to wooded areas, tick bites (Lyme disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, relapsing fever), and mosquito bites (arboviruses). The dietary history should focus on consumption of raw meat (brucellosis, toxoplasmosis), game meat (tularemia), raw fish (hepatitis, salmonellosis), and unpasteurized milk (brucellosis, salmonellosis). Children who have pica may expose themselves to infectious diseases such as visceral larva migrans or toxoplasmosis.

High spiking fevers suggest transient bacteremia associated with pyogenic infections. This pattern also is seen in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Typhoid fever classically is sustained. Relapsing fevers are seen in malaria, Borrelia infections, rat-bite fever, and lymphomas. Recurrent fevers separated by several afebrile days may represent a series of different infections ("pseudo-FUO''), perhaps as a result of an underlying immunodeficiency state. The height or pattern of fever itself has not been shown to predict the ultimate diagnosis or prognosis in the larger pediatric FUO series.


PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

The physical examination of a child who has FUO must be both thorough and repeated, for studies suggest that 25% of patients develop key findings at some point after their initial presentation.
A careful dermatologic examination may demonstrate the evanescent rash of JRA, which recurs at the time of fever spikes. A perineal rash may aid in the diagnosis of Kawasaki syndrome, a seborrheic rash in histiocytosis, and petechiae or purpura in bacterial endocarditis or a systemic vasculitis.

Generalized adenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly suggests viral infections (eg, infectious mononucleosis) and collagen vascular disease (eg, JRA, drug reactions, leukemia, or HIV-related immunodeficiency). Regional adenopathy indicates a localized bacterial infection, cat-scratch disease, or malignancy.
Conjunctivitis is found with Kawasaki syndrome, leptospirosis, tularemia, and systemic lupus erythematosis. Fundoscopic examination may reveal papilledema (brain tumor, subdural hematoma, meningoencephalitis), Roth spots (infective endo-carditis), or granulomatous changes (tuberculosis, sarcoidosis). A slit lamp examination is useful in identifying uveitis (JRA, Crohn disease, toxoplasmosis).

Joints, including the hips, should be examined for arthropathy associated with collagen inflammatory disorders, toxic synovitis, or septic arthritis. Reactive arthritis is seen with brucellosis, bacterial enteric infections such as shigellosis, and hepatitis virus infection. Bony tenderness could indicate osteomyelitis or neoplastic marrow invasion. The sinuses and mastoid area should be palpated carefully and transilluminated. Muscle soreness is seen with underlying abscesses.

Every patient who has FUO should receive a rectal examination to look for tenderness or adenopathy indicative of abdominal or pelvic abscesses or tumors.
Stools should be examined for occult blood loss (guaiac test), characteristic of inflammatory bowel disease. A pelvic examination is indicated in adolescent females to rule out inflammatory disease or abscess.

LABORATORY EVALUATION

All patients who have FUO should have a complete blood count with differential taken. Anemia is seen in inflammatory bowel disease, JRA, malaria, and parvovirus B19 infection. Low platelet counts are associated with EBV infection, toxoplasmosis, tuberculosis, and spirochetal infections. Thrombocytosis is common in Kawasaki syndrome. Leukocytosis with a "left shift'' increases the likelihood of bacterial infection, whereas atypical lymphocytes are characteristic of systemic viral infections. Immature leukocyte forms or pancytopenia suggest leukemia.

Aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures, urinalysis, tuberculin skin test (with controls), liver chemistries, serum protein analysis, and chest and sinus radiographs are appropriate initial "screens'' for children who have FUO. In older children, a heterophil antibody test and antinuclear antibody titer could be added to the list. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein level are of little diagnostic value, but as indicators of significant illness (bacterial infection, tumor, collagen vascular disease), they can be useful to follow disease activity and guide the need for further evaluation.


DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH

A schematic approach to the evaluation of the child who has FUO is shown in Figure 4. The algorithm emphasizes an essential feature in the evaluation: the painstaking pursuit of every diagnostic lead uncovered, no matter how insignificant it may appear at first.
History or physical findings provide the clue to the final diagnosis in the majority of patients. Potential exposure to infectious agents via sick contacts, travel to endemic areas, or dietary intake should guide serologic studies and special cultures. A history of repeated infections may signal the need for a more elaborate immunologic evaluation or HIV serology. Abdominal symptoms or linear growth impairment indicate barium studies to rule out inflammatory bowel disease. Unusual cutaneous findings or enlarged lymph nodes may yield a diagnosis on biopsy.

Failure to use existing laboratory data appropriately also has been shown to contribute significantly to delayed diagnosis of FUO. Abnormal findings in the peripheral blood may be an indication for bone marrow examination. Eosinophilia is seen in parasitic infections, drug reactions, and malignancy. Sterile pyuria is a common overlooked diagnostic clue to Kawasaki syndrome or tuberculosis. Evidence of liver inflammation, biochemical dysfunction, or cholestasis should be pursued with appropriate serologies (hepatitis screen, EBV/CMV, leptospirosis) and ultrasonographic imaging.


IS HOSPITAL ADMISSION NECESSARY?

If a child who has FUO is not systemically ill, if thorough history taking, physical examination, and screening laboratory studies have been performed, and if all diagnostic leads have been pursued, it is appropriate to follow the patient over time in the outpatient setting. Studies suggest that up to 20% of fevers will resolve spontaneously, with the specific cause never determined. Important physical findings or laboratory abnormalities may develop later.

Hospital admission, however, is indicated for very young children or for those who have severe systemic symptoms. An advantage to admitting children who have FUO is the opportunity for careful, repeated history-taking and physical examination. Constant observation may unveil subtle clinical features (eg, the rash of JRA). A parent's misinterpretation of several unrelated febrile illnesses as persistent fever (pseudo-FUO) and factitious fevers (eg, Munchausen syndrome by proxy) sometimes is clarified only by hospital admission.


MORE ELABORATE TESTING

If fever persists beyond a month or if the child is systemically ill or failing to thrive, more elaborate testing is justified. A gallium white blood cell scan may help to localize abscesses, granulomatous foci (eg, tuberculosis, sarcoidosis), and certain malignancies (lymphomas, many solid tumors). A technetium bone scan may reveal an occult osteomyelitis. Spinal fluid analysis should be considered in patients who have headache or neurologic symptoms. Bone marrow examination is indicated to rule out hematologic malignancies or neuroblastoma; the marrow also should be cultured for mycobacteria and salmonella. Abdominal ultrasonography, body computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging may identify masses, deep lymph nodes, or abscesses. Studies suggest that exploratory laparotomy is not useful unless indicated by imaging studies.


TREATMENT

A child in whom JRA is suspected should receive a trial of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Empiric trials of broad-spectrum antibiotics generally are without diagnostic or therapeutic benefit and may mask or delay the diagnosis of infections such as endocarditis, meningitis, or osteomyelitis. The high incidence of infectious processes emphasizes the need for bacterial cultures before antibiotics are started.

Conclusion

The wise evaluation and treatment of fever in children tests the skills of the best pediatrician. This article offers an approach that we hope simplifies that process and will result in a higher degree of accuracy in diagnosis and treatment.


*From the Department of Medicine, The Children's Hospital, and the Departments of Pediatrics, Boston City Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston MA.

SUGGESTED READING


Alario AJ, Nelson EW, Shapiro ED. Blood cultures in the management of febrile outpatients later found to have bacteremia. J Pediatr. 1989;115:196--199
Atkins E. Fever. The old and the new. J Infect Dis. 1984;149:339--348
Baker RC, Tiller T, Bauscher JC, et al. Severity of disease correlated with fever reduction in febrile infants. Pediatrics. 1989;83:1016--1019
Baraff LJ, Bass JW, Fleisher GR, et al. Practice guideline for the management of infants and children 0-36 months of age with fever without cause. J Pediatr. 1993;92:1--12

Burg J, Etzwiler L, Petrychi S, et al. Outcome in highly febrile non-bacteremic children. Ped Emerg Care. 1989;5:282
Dascombe MJ. The pharmacology of fever. Progress in Neuro-Biology. 1985;25:328--373
Davis AT, Fleisher G, Jaffe DM, et al. Antibiotic administration to treat possible occult bacteremia in febrile children. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1175--1180
Dinarello CA, Wolff SM. Molecular basis of fever in humans. Am J Med. 1982;72:799--819

Feigin RD, Shearer WT. Fever of unknown origin in children. Curr Prob Ped. 1976;6:2--57
Fleisher G, Rosenberg W, Vinci R, et al. Intramuscular vs oral antibiotic therapy for the prevention of meningitis and other bacterial sequelae in young febrile children at risk for occult bacteremia. J Pediatr., in press
Frenkel LD and the Multicenter Ceftriaxone Pediatric Study Group. Once-daily administration of ceftriaxone for the treatment of selected serious bacterial infections in children. Pediatrics. 1988;82:486--491

Gartner JC. Fever of unknown origin. Adv Pediatr Infect Dis. 1992;7:1--24
Grant JA, Pelton SI, Teele DW, et al. Bacteremia in febrile children under 2 years of age: results of cultures of blood of 600 consecutive febrile children seen in a "walk-in'' clinic. J Pediatr. 1975;87:227--230
Jaffe D, Tanz RR, Davis AT, et al. Antibiotic administration to treat possible occult bacteremia in febrile children. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1175--1180
Lieu TA, Baskin MA, Schwartz JS, Fleisher GR. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of outpatient strategies for management of febrile infants. Pediatrics. 1992;8916:1135--1144

Lohr JA, Hendley JO. Prolonged fever of unknown origin: a record of experiences with 54 childhood patients. Clin Pediatr. 1977;16:768--773
Lorin MI. The Febrile Child: Clinical Management of Fever and Other Types of Pyrexia. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1992:161A
McCarthy PL, Lembo RM, Baron MA, et al. Predictive value of abnormal physical examination findings in ill-appearing and well-appearing febrile children. Pediatrics. 1985;76:167--171

McClung HJ. Prolonged fever of unknown origin in children. Am J Dis Child. 1972;124:544--550
Pizzo PA, Lovejoy FH, Smith DH. Prolonged fever in children: review of 100 cases. Pediatrics 1967;55:468--473
Shapiro ED. Bacteremia in the Febrile Child. Chicago, IL: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc; 1986:19--35
Vane J, Botting R. Inflammation and the mechanism of action of anti-inflammatory drugs. FASEB J. 1987;1:89--96



PIR QUIZ


1. Antipyretic therapy is most likely to be effective in the treatment of fever caused by:


A. Collagen-vascular disease.
B. Ectodermal dysplasias.
C. Heat stroke.
D. Hyperthyroidism.
E. Salicylism.


Answer


2. Among the following, the least acceptable argument against lowering fever with antipyretics is that:


A. Adverse effects of treatment outweigh benefits.
B. Fever may be protective to the host.
C. Interleukin-1 is suppressed.
D. Lowering can obscure diagnostic signs.
E. Most fever is short-lived.


Answer


3. Among the following, the organism that most commonly causes occult bacteremia in small children is:


A. Group A Streptococcus.
B. Haemophilus influenzae type b.
C. Neisseria meningitidis.
D. Salmonella sp.
E. Streptococcus pneumoniae.


Answer


4. The incidence of complications from occult bacteremia is highest in children infected with:


A. Group A Streptococcus.
B. Haemophilus influenzae type b.
C. Neisseria meningitidis.
D. Salmonella sp.
E. Streptococcus pneumoniae.


Answer

5. A true statement regarding fever of unknown origin is:


A. An infectious etiology is unlikely.
B. A specific diagnosis ultimately can be made in all cases.
C. Rectal examination should be reserved for patients who

have bowel symptoms.

D. Serial physical examinations can be helpful to diagnosis.
E. The majority of patients ultimately are found to have a rare disease.


Answer


6. Among the following causes of fever of unknown origin, which might be best diagnosed by admission to the hospital?


A. Drug reaction.
B. Factitious fever.
C. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
D. Leptospirosis.
E. Sarcoidosis.


Answer



Acute Renal Failure
Acute renal failure (ARF).

Acute renal failure is defined as the acute cessation of glomerular filtration.
A. Prerenal failure. All patients with apparent ARF must be assessed for a prerenal cause.
1. Etiology
Dehydration, hypovolemia, or hemodynamic factors can compromise renal perfusion and intrarenal blood flow.
2. Evaluation
a. Review the history and physical findings for evidence of volume depletion, shock, decreased intravascular volume, and/or decreased cardiac output.
b. Measure the blood pressure and central venous pressure (CVP).
c. Insert an indwelling bladder catheter to ascertain the urine output (<0.5 ml/kg/hr indicates severe oliguria) and to obtain urine for urinalysis, sodium, potassium, creatinine (Cr), and osmolality. Do not leave the catheter indwelling after the initial evaluation.
3. The diagnosis of prerenal failure is suggested by:
a. Urinary sodium < 15 mEq/liter, fractional sodium excretion (FENa) < 1.0 (FENa= urine/PNa divided by U/PCr x 100), renal failure index (RFI) < 1 (RFI= UNa divided by U/Pcr, x 100). Note: RFI can be <1.0 in acute glomerulonephritis (GN), interstitial nephritis, early acute obstruction, and polyuric ATN.
b. A ratio of U/P urea> 10: 1, U/P creatinine > 40: 1, urine osmoiality> 500
c. Urinary potassium > 40 mEq/liter
d. Increased urine output in response to rehydration or increased intravascular volume, or both
e. Improved renal function with improved cardiac function.
4. Treatment
Treatment is aimed at restoring renal blood flow and function.
a. Insert an IV line for infusion of fluids and solute. In some patients, CVP monitoring is useful.
b. Reestablish an effective circulating blood volume.
c. If, after restoration of extracellular fluid (ECF) volume, oliguria or anuria persists, mannitol, 0.5 gm/kg of a 20% solution, should be infused over 10-20 minutes. This should result in an increase in urine output of approximately 6-10 ml/kg over the next 1-3 hours. If no increase in urine flow occurs, no further mannitol should be given.
d. A trial dose of furosemide, 1 mg/kg IV, should be administered after the ECF volume is restored.
e. If marked oligoanuria persists, assess the patient for intrinsic renal or postrenal failure

B. Intrinsic renal failure
1. Etiology
Renal parenchymal injury can result from a variety of causes. A history of severe and/or prolonged decreased renal perfusion suggests ARF due to ATN. Acute renal failure may be associated with acute glomerulonephritis, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, accelerated hypertension, uric acid nephropathy, or vasculitis.
2. Evaluation and diagnosis
First, assess the patient for prerenal or postrenal causes of ARF.
a. Stabilize the patientط·آ£ط¢آ¢ط£آ¢أ¢â‚¬ع‘ط¢آ¬ط£آ¢أ¢â‚¬â€چط¢آ¢s condition before any invasive diagnostic procedures are performed.
b. Obtain estimates of renal function
(1) U/P creatinine ratio < 20
(2) Urine osmolality < 350
(3) Urinary sodium concentration >40, FENa >3,RFI>1
(4) A radionuclide renal scan can be useful in assessing renal perfusion and function as well as in distinguishing intrinsic renal failure from cortical necrosis. Abdominal ultrasound is helpful in ruling out obstruction and shows characteristic patterns in chronic renal damage.
3. Treatment
a. The use of an indwelling catheter should be discontinued as soon as possible in a severely oligoanuric patient in whom intrinsic renal failure is established.
b. Weigh the patient bid (or use a metabolic bed with a scale).
C. Measure intake and output.
d. Fluid management
(1) Fluid and electrolyte replacement should be calculated as insensible losses plus urine output (if the patient is not edematous
or does not have fluid overload).
(2) Give as many calories as possible, orally if practical. A peripheral IV line can tolerate 10-15% glucose; a central line can tolerate up to 30% glucose.
(3) When diuresis begins, increasing urine volume must be replaced with a solution containing approximately the same electrolytes as are being excreted. If the patient has been hyperkalemic, do not replace potassium until the serum potassium has returned to normal.
e. Hyperkalemia
(1) If the serum potassium is 5.5ط·آ£ط¢آ¢ط£آ¢أ¢â‚¬ع‘ط¢آ¬ط£آ¢أ¢â€ڑآ¬أ¢â‚¬إ’7.0 mEq/liter, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (Kayexalate) in sorbitol at a dose of 1 gm/kg can be given P0 or PR and repeated q4-6 hours until potassium is lowered.
(2) If the serum potassium is above 7 mEq/liter and/or if electrocardiogram changes are present, one or both of the following therapies are indicated immediately. Monitor the patientط·آ£ط¢آ¢ط£آ¢أ¢â‚¬ع‘ط¢آ¬ط£آ¢أ¢â‚¬â€چط¢آ¢s ECG.
(a) Give 10% calcium gluconate, 0.5-1.0 ml/kg IV over 5-10 minutes, with ECG monitoring.
(b) Give sodium bicarbonate, 2 mEq/kg, as an IV push over 5-10 minutes.
(3) If hyperkalemia persists, administer insulin, 0.1 U/kg IV with 25% glucose as 0.5 gm/kg (2 ml/kg) over 30 minutes. This dose can be repeated in 30ط·آ£ط¢آ¢ط£آ¢أ¢â‚¬ع‘ط¢آ¬ط£آ¢أ¢â€ڑآ¬أ¢â‚¬إ’60 minutes if necessary. Monitor the blood sugar with Dextrostix. Prepare to dialyze the patient.
(4) Acute dialysis is usually necessary if the potassium is above 7.5 mEq/liter, if the measures in (2) fail, or if (3) is needed.
f. Acidosis can usually be alleviated by providing glucose for calories as well as 1-3 mEq/kg/day exogenous bicarbonate, citrate, or lactate. If the acidosis is severe and treatment is difficult due to fluid overload, dialysis is indicated.
g. Nutrition. Optimal calories and protein nitrogen will help to decrease catabolism, lower BUN, ameliorate the uremic state, and improve healing and the immune response. With restricted fluids, little nitrogen and only 15-25 percent of calories can be given by a peripheral IV line.
(1) If the patient can take POs, optimize the calories of dietary solids and increase the caloric density of fluids with glucose polymers (Polycose).
The estimated caloric needs in ARF are 40-80 calories/kg/day, though some patients require more calories to suppress catabolism. Provide 3-5 percent of the total calories as protein.
(2) If the patient will be NPO for over a week and renal failure is profound, consider total parenteral nutrition
h. Hypertension. If hypertension is acute and severe (2 S.D. above the age-appropriate norms), treat as outlined for hypertensive emergencies
(1) Antihypertensive agents with rapid onset of action should be selected.
(2) Hemodialysis or phlebotomy is indicated when hypertension is severe and unresponsive to medical management.
Congestive heart failure
i. Congestive heart failure
(1) Can usually be prevented by proper fluid restriction.
(2) There is no place for diuretics in the anuric patient.
(3) Digitalis will not produce a dramatic effect. If CHF is severe, dialysis is indicated.
j. Drug therapy. Adjust the dosage of all drugs metabolized or excreted by the kidney.
k. Indications for dialysis
(1) Volume overload with severe hypertension or CHF
(2) Hyperkalemia refractory to medical management
(3) Severe acidosis associated with either fluid overload or hypernatremia
(4) Symptomatic uremia (e.g., drowsiness, irritability) or rapidly rising
BUN, Cr
(5) Marked calcium/phosphorus imbalance (e.g., symptomatic hypocalcemia associated with severe hyperphosphatemia)
(6) Support for parenteral nutrition

C. Postrenal failure
1. Etiology
Obstruction is usually due to congenital anomalies, urethral valves or stricture, hematuria with clots, tumor compression, or retroperitoneal
fibrosis.
2. EvaluatIon and diagnosis
Obstruction is suggested by a history of genitourinary abnormalities, or lower abdominal trauma, or by the finding of flank masses or an enlarged bladder. Bilateral ureteral obstruction is suggested by absolute anuria.
a. Do a renal ultrasonogram and a radionuclide scan. If facilities for these studies are unavailable and the serum creatinine K 5 mg/dl, an IVP can be attempted. The patient should be adequately hydrated and minimal amounts of a low-osmolaiity contrast agent should be used.
b. Urologic consultation should be obtained.
c. A cystoscopy with a unilateral retrograde pyelogram should be considered if anuria is present and obstruction is suspected.
3. Treatment
consists of surgical correction or bypass, as required.






Email:
alsadekeen@hotmail.com
Website:
Hofuf Medical Forum